Interpersonal Communication in Virtual Laboratories during the pandemic: a systematic literature review

Article Sidebar

methaodos.revista de ciencias sociales. Vol. 11 Núm. 2 (2023)
PDF (English) HTML (English) Mobile (English) ePUB (English) XML (English)
Publicado: Set 28, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17502/mrcs.v11i2.704
Métricas alternativas:

Main Article Content

Inna Artemova
Universidad de Guadalajara
Rosa Leonor Ulloa Cazarez
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3868-0166
Universidad de Guadalajara
Marco Antonio Chávez Aguayo
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6761-4830
Universidad de Guadalajara

Resumo

Interpersonal communication is crucial in education for developing lifelong problem-solving skills. Despite its decline during the pandemic, research in virtual educational environments, such as Virtual Laboratories, remains limited. On the other hand, the pandemic has stimulated exploration and development of these tools. The objective of this article is to identify problematic situations in Virtual Laboratories to enhance interpersonal communication. Employing a Systematic Literature Review method encompassing articles published between 2019 and 2022, our study yields the following key findings: a) Interpersonal communication remains undercovered in main focus; b) Technical and natural disciplines dominate in Virtual Laboratories; c) The research on interpersonal communication is insufficiently addressed in main objectives and results; d) Interpersonal communication is valued for various pedagogical reasons, with its relevance in collaborative learning standing out; e) The concept of Virtual Laboratory adopted by researchers may guide the way the importance of interpersonal communication is seen. This research will benefit the innovation process in the context of Virtual Laboratories in need to develop the competencies of global importance.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Article Details

Como Citar
Artemova, I., Ulloa Cazarez, R. L., & Chávez Aguayo, M. A. (2023). Interpersonal Communication in Virtual Laboratories during the pandemic: a systematic literature review . methaodos.Revista De Ciências Sociais, 11(2), m231102a12. https://doi.org/10.17502/mrcs.v11i2.704
Edição
v. 11 n. 2 (2023)
Secção
Artigos
Creative Commons License

Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0.

Biografias Autor

Inna Artemova, Universidad de Guadalajara

PhD in philological sciences. She has taught at the Philological faculty of the University of Saint-Petersburg in Russia and the Faculty of Comparative Culture at the University of Tsukuba in Japan. Currently, she is a professor at the Virtual University System at the University of Guadalajara in Mexico. Her research interests revolve around the transition to virtual environments in education and the development of interdisciplinary skills. Currently, she is particularly focused on the convergence between humanistic sciences and technology.

Rosa Leonor Ulloa Cazarez, Universidad de Guadalajara

Mexican professor and researcher. Educational and data scientist, innovator, business consultant and analyst. Works on learning analytics and prediction models. Member of Researchers National System in Mexico since 2018. Holds a Ph.D. in Information Technologies, a Master in Science in Educational policies and management, and a bachelor in Education.

Marco Antonio Chávez Aguayo, Universidad de Guadalajara

Cultural manager, lawyer, psychologist, and musician. Tenured Full Professor at the System of Virtual University of the University of Guadalajara (Mexico). Chartered scientist of the United Kingdom and National Researcher of the National System of Researchers in Mexico. He holds a PhD in Culture and Heritage Management and a Master’s degree in Cultural Management (University of Barcelona, Spain) and a Master’s degree in Comparative Studies of Literature, Art, and Thought (Pompeu Fabra University, Spain). He is also a Bachelor of Law (Secretary of Public Education, Mexico) and a Doctor of Law (University Institute of High Education, Mexico).

Referências

Akpan, V. I., Igwe, U. A., Mpamah, I. B. I., & Okoro, C. O. (2020). Social constructivism: implications on teaching and learning. British Journal of Education, 8(8), 49-56.

Battelle for Kids. (n.d.). Framework for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved April 16 2023 from: https://is.gd/8batoW

Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i-vi. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083

Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with Eight Proficiency Levels and Examples of Use (JRC Working Paper No. JRC106281). Joint Research Centre, European Commission. Retrieved March 1 2023 from de: https://is.gd/Pq1KGF

Ciapponi, A. (2021). La declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para reportar revisiones sistemáticas. Evidencia, actualización en la práctica ambulatoria, 24(3), http://dx.doi.org/10.51987/evidencia.v24i4.6960

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. Routledge.

Dobrzański, L. A., & Honysz, R. (2010). The idea of a material science virtual laboratory. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 42(1-2), 196-203.

Erdem, M. B., Kiraz, A., Eski, H., Çiftçi, Ö., & Kubat, C. (2016). A conceptual framework for cloud-based integration of Virtual laboratories as a multi-agent system approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 102, 452-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.04.011

Eshach, H. (2007). Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: Formal, non-formal, and informal education. Journal of science education and technology, 16, 171-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9027-1

Fuad, D. R. S. M., Musa, K., & Hashim, Z. (2022). Innovation culture in education: A systematic review of the literature. Management in Education, 36(3), 135-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020620959760

García Aretio, L. (2021). COVID-19 y educación a distancia digital: preconfinamiento, confinamiento y posconfinamiento. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(1), 9-32. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.1.28080

García Gómez, T., y Carmona Fernández, J. J. (2014). Profesor y alumnado conectados en una red pública compartida. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 32(2), 463-478. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.32.2.171801

Greere, A. (2021). Shaping proactive higher education: Pandemic research and its value for future-proofing. Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 9(1), 201-206. https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe-9(1)-2021pp201-206

Gubsky, D., Daineko, Y., Ipalakova, M., Kleschenkov, A., & Tsoy, D. (2022). Computer model of a spectrum analyzer for a virtual laboratory: development and introduction to the educational process. PeerJ Computer Science, 8, e1130. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1130

Hardisty, A. R., Bacall, F., Beard, N., Balcázar-Vargas, M. P., Balech, B., Barcza, Z., ... & Yilmaz, P. (2016). BioVeL: a virtual laboratory for data analysis and modelling in biodiversity science and ecology. BMC ecology, 16, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-016-0103-y

Kaputa, V., Loučanová, E., & Tejerina-Gaite, F. A. (2022). Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions as a Driver of Social Oriented Innovations. In C., Păunescu, KL., Lepik, & N. Spencer (Eds.), Social Innovation in Higher Education. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management (pp. 61-85). Springer.

Kicherova M., & Efimova G. (2020). The Impact of Non-Formal Education on Human Capital: A Generational Approach. Integratsiya obrazovaniya = Integration of Education, 24(2), 316-338. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.099.024.202002.316-338

Kirsch, I., & Lennon, M. L. (2017). PIAAC: A new design for a new era. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 5(11). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-017-0046-6

Lei, Z., Zhou, H., Hu, W., & Liu, G. P. (2022). Toward an international platform: A web-based multi-language system for remote and virtual laboratories using react framework. Heliyon, 8(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10780

Lundberg, C. A., & Sheridan, D. (2015). Benefits of engagement with peers, faculty, and diversity for online learners. College Teaching, 63(1), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2014.972317

Makransky, G., Mayer, R. E., Veitch, N., Hood, M., Christensen, K. B., & Gadegaard, H. (2019). Equivalence of using a desktop virtual reality science simulation at home and in class. Plos one, 14(4), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214944

Manafi, M., & Subramaniam, I.D. (2015). Relationship between human resources management practices, transformational leadership, and knowledge sharing on innovation in Iranian electronic industry. Asian Social Science, 11(10), 358-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n10p358

Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Mora, C. E., Añorbe-Díaz, B., & González-Marrero, A. (2017). Virtual technologies trends in education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 469-486. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00626a

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Moldovan, O., & Bocoş-Binţinţan, V. (2015). The necessity of reconsidering the concept of non-formal education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 209, 337-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.245

Naffi, N. (2020). Disruption in and by Centres for Teaching and Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Leading the Future of Higher: L’Observatoire Internationale sur les Impacts Sociétaux de l’IA et du Numerique and the Government of Québec. Retrieved March 1 2023 from: https://is.gd/4oiFt8

Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrović, V. M., & Jovanović, K. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Computers & Education, 95, 309-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002

Raman, R., Achuthan, K., Nair, V. K., & Nedungadi, P. (2022). Virtual Laboratories- A historical review and bibliometric analysis of the past three decades. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 11055-11087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11058-9

Redmond, P., Abawi, L., Brown, A., Henderson, R., & Heffernan, A. (2018). An online engagement framework for higher education. Online learning, 22(1), 183-204. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175

Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2005). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526

Schnieder, M., Williams, S., & Ghosh, S. (2022). Comparison of in-person and virtual labs/tutorials for engineering students using blended learning principles. Education Sciences, 12(3), 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030153

Schreiber, L. M., & Valle, B. E. (2013). Social Constructivist Teaching Strategies in the Small Group Classroom. Small Group Research, 2, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496413488422

Senapati, S. (2022). Peeking into the Sophisticated World of Interactive Science Simulations. Resonance, 27(11), 1971-1983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12045-022-1493-0

Tee, K., Brush, A. B., & Inkpen, K. M. (2009). Exploring communication and sharing between extended families. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(2), 128-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.09.007

UNESCO (2016). Education 2030 Framework for Action. Retrieved May 13 2023 from: https://is.gd/JIVUXv

UNESCO (2020). Education in the time of COVID-19. Retrieved April 5 2023 from: https://is.gd/ndLfRL

UNESCO (2021). Sustainable Development Goal 4 and its targets. Retrieved April 5 2023 from: https://is.gd/J90BRN

UNICEF (2017). Education for life: key 21st century competencies in curricula in Montenegro. Retrieved May 2 2023 from: https://is.gd/BN2x4I

Valenzuela, J. (2017). La innovación como objeto de investigación en educación: problemas, tensiones y experiencias. In M. S. Ramírez-Montoya, y J. R. Valenzuela González (Eds.): Innovación educativa. Investigación, formación, vinculación y visibilidad, (pp. 29-50). Síntesis.

Yin, H., & Shi, L. (2022). Which type of interpersonal interaction better facilitates college student learning and development in China: Face-to-face or online? ECNU Review of Education, 5(1), 9-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311211010818