#GobiernoCriminal! Framing the Spanish far right during the first Covid-19 wave
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Extremist parties have become important political actors in the European Parliament and participate in national or regional coalitions. Spanish party Vox defends a combination of tradition, conservatism, nationalism, liberalism, and far-right values. Vox became the third force of the Spanish Parliament growing rapidly amid the harsh social measures taken by the Spanish Government. Without the editorial control of traditional media, far-right discourse is highly prominent on social media also for Vox. The objective of this research is to define the political strategy implemented by Vox on Twitter during the first lockdown in Spain. The research applies framing analysis in three phases: open coding and axial coding to subsamples and a final framing analysis on a sample of 6095 tweets. Results show three main frames. Anti-elitism is defined as victimhood and anti-vox conspiracy. Essentialism is defined as moral, national essentialism, and public order. And finally, Criminal Government, the new frame accusing the government. This study suggests that Vox combines the populist, liberal and conservative discourses to deny the government’s legitimacy and to turn into an alternative option, although their party dubiously is.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Aalberg, T., Strömbäck, J., & de Vreese, C.H. (2012). The framing of politics as strategy and game: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 162-178.
Acemoglu, D., Egorov, G., & Sonin, K.. (2013). A Political Theory of Populism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(2), 771–805. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjs077
Åkerlund, M. (2020). The importance of influential users in (re) producing Swedish far-right discourse on Twitter. European Journal of Communication. 35(6), 613-628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120940909
Alonso-Muñoz, L., & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2018). Communication of European populist leaders on Twitter: Agenda setting and the “more is less” effect. El profesional de la información (EPI), 27(6), 1193-1202. https://doi.org/10.3145/EPI
Álvarez-Junco, J. (2022). Qué hacer con un pasado sucio. Galaxia Gutenberg.
Atton, C. (2006). Far-right media on the internet: culture, discourse and power. New Media and Society, 8(4): 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444806065653
Barrio, A., & Field, B. N. (2018). The push for independence in Catalonia. Nature human behaviour, 2(10), 713-715.
Bliuc, A. M., Faulkner, N., Jakubowicz, A., & McGarty, C. (2018). Online networks of racial hate: A systematic review of 10 years of research on cyber-racism. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.026
Blee, K. M (2007). Ethnographies of the Far Right. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 36(2), 119-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241606298815
Bolsing, R., Palm, K., & Kingsland, J. (2020). The green infrastructure revolution: Creating sustainable places from the ground up. Routledge.
Borah, P. (2011). Conceptual issues in framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade's literature. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 230-256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01539.x
Brubaker, R. (2020). Paradoxes of populism during the pandemic. Thesis Eleven, 164(1),73-87.
Casero-Ripollés, A., Sintes-Olivella, M., & Franch, P. (2017). The Populist Political Communication Style in Action: Podemos’s Issues and Functions on Twitter During the 2016 Spanish General Election. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(9), 986–1001. http://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217707624
Casero-Ripollés, A. (2020). Impact of Covid-19 on the media system. Communicative and democratic consequences of news consumption during the outbreak. El profesional de la información (EPI), 29(2), e290223. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.mar.23
Castelli Gattinara, P. (2017) Framing Exclusion in the Public Sphere: Far- Right Mobilisation and the Debate on Charlie Hebdo in Italy, South European Society and Politics, 22(3), 345-364.
Crosset, V., Tanner, S., & Campana, A. (2019). Researching far right groups on Twitter: Methodological challenges 2.0. New Media and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818817306
David, C. C., Atun, J. M., Fille, E., Monterola, C. (2011). Finding Frames: Comparing Two Methods of Frame Analysis. Communication Methods and Measures, 5(4), 329-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2011.624873
Eberl, J.-M., Huber, R. A., & Greussing, E. (2021). From populism to the “plandemic”: why populists believe in Covid-19 conspiracies. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 31(sup1), 272-284.
Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and social media: how politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information Communication and Society, 20(8), 1109-1126.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4): 58-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
Fairhurst, G., & Sarr, R. (1996). The art of Framing. Jossey-Bass.
Figenschou, T., & Ihlebæk, K. (2018). Challenging Journalistic Authority: Media criticism in far-right alternative media. Journalism Studies, 20, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1500868
Figuereo-Benítez, J. C., Cárdenas Rica, M. L., & Mancinas-Chávez, R. (2022). Transparencia pública para la verificación de datos. El caso de Maldito Dato (Maldita.es). Textual & Visual Media, 1(16), 22-43.
Forti, S., (2021). Extrema derecha 2.0. Qué es y cómo combatirla. Siglo XXI.
Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge University Press.
Gerbaudo, P. (2018). Social media and populism: an elective affinity? Media, Culture & Society, 40(5), 745-753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772192
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Koc Michalska, K., & Römmele, A. (2020). Populism in the era of Twitter: how social media contextualized new insights into an old phenomenon. New Media & Society, 22(4), 585-594
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harper & Row.
Golder, M. (2016). Far Right Parties in Europe. Annual Reviews of Political Science, 19, 477-497.
Guerrero-Solé, F., & Lopez-Gonzalez, H. (2019). Government Formation and Political Discussions in Twitter: An Extended Model for Quantifying Political Distances in Multiparty Democracies. Social Science Computer Review, 37(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317744163
Guerrero-Solé, F., Pujadas, E., Aira, T. & Mas-Manchón, L. (2022). Politicized celebrities against far-right on Twitter. Political preferences and activity of users retweeting Rosalia’s anti Vox tweet after the 2019 general elections in Spain. Mediterranean Journal of Communication, 13(2), https://www.doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM.19953
Guerrero-Solé, F., Mas-Manchón, L., & Aira, T. (2022). El impacto de la ultraderecha en Twitter durante las elecciones españolas de 2019. Cuadernos. info, (51), 223-245.
Iyengar, S. S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. University of Chicago Press.
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1982). On the study of statistical intuitions. Cognition, 11(2), 123-141.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American psychologist, 39(4), 341-350.
Lakoff, G. (1995). Metaphor, Morality, and Politics, or, Why Conservatives Have Left Liberals in the Dust. Social Research, 62(2), 177-213.
Lakoff, G. (1997). Moral Politics: What Conservatives Know That Liberals Don't. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (2004). Don't think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate: the essential guide for progressives. White River Junction, Vt.: Chelsea Green.
Lawrence, R. G. (2000). Game-Framing the Issues: Tracking the Strategy Frame in Public Policy News, Political Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846000198422
Marantz, A. (2019). Antisocial: Online Extremists, Techno-Utopians, and the Hijacking of the American Conversation. Viking.
McSwiney, J. (2020): Social networks and digital organisation: far-right parties at the 2019 Australian federal election. Information, Communication & Society, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1757132
Montané-Goetzemberger, M. M. (2016). La inmunidad española ante partidos de derecha radical. University of Barcelona.
Mudde, C. (2018). The ideology of the extreme right. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137753
Müller, J. (2014). #Podemos. Deconstruyendo a Pablo Iglesias. Deusto-Planeta.
Müller, J. (2019). La sorpresa Vox: Las respuestas a las 10 grandes preguntas que todos nos hacemos sobre Vox. Deusto-Planeta.
Nuñez-Seixas, J. (2018). Suspiros de España. Crítica.
Portelinha, I., & Elcheroth, G. (2016). From marginal to mainstream: The role of perceived social norms in the rise of a far-right movement. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 661-671. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2224
Postman, N. (1985). Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. Penguin.
Protess, D. L., & McCombs, M. (2016). Agenda setting. Routledge.
Reinemann C., Aalberg T., Esser F., Strömbäck J., & de Vreese C. H. (2017). Populist political communication: Towards a model of its causes, forms, and effects. In: T. Aalberg T., F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, & C. de Vreese C. (Eds) Populist Political Communication in Europe, (pp. 12-16). Routledge.
Rone, J. (2021) Far right alternative news media as ‘indignation mobilization mechanisms’: how the far right opposed the Global Compact for Migration. Information, Communication & Society, 25, 1333-1350. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1864001
Rooduijn, M. (2014). The Mesmerising Message: The Diffusion of Populism in Public Debates in Western European Media. Political Studies, 62(4), 726-744. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12074
Rubio-Pueyo, V. (2019). Vox: A New Far Right in Spain. Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung Institute, 1-25.
Ryan, C. (1991). Prime time activism: Media strategies for grassroots organizing. South End Press.
Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a Theory of Media Effects. Journal of Communication, 49(4), 103-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x
Semetko, H. & Valkenburg, P. (2000). Framing European Politics: A Content Analysis of Press and Television News. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x
Stanley, J. (2018). How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them. Random House.
Taggart, P. (2000). Populism: Concepts in the social sciences. Open University Press.
Taggart, P. (2004). Populism and representative politics in contemporary Europe. Journal of political ideologies, 9(3), 269-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356931042000263528
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
Urbinati, N., 2019. Political Theory of Populism. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 111–127.
Veiga, F., González-Villa, C., Forti, S., Sasso, A., Prokopljevic, J., & Moles, R. (2019). Patriotas indignados: Sobre la nueva ultraderecha en la Posguerra Fría. Neofascismo, posfascismo y nazbols. Alianza Editorial.
Valenzuela, S., Piña, M., & Ramírez, J. (2017). Behavioral Effects of Framing on Social Media Users: How Conflict, Economic, Human Interest, and Morality Frames Drive News Sharing. Journal of Communication, 67(5), 803-826. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12325
Waisbord, S. (2018). Truth is what happens to news. Journalism Studies, 19, 1866-1878.