#GobiernoCriminal! Enquadrando a extrema direita espanhola durante a primeira onda de Covid-19
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Resumo
Os partidos extremistas tornaram-se importantes atores políticos no Parlamento Europeu e participam de coalizões nacionais ou regionais. O partido Vox da Espanha defende uma mistura de tradição, conservadorismo, nacionalismo, liberalismo e valores de extrema-direita. Vox tornou-se a terceira força no Parlamento espanhol, crescendo rapidamente devido às medidas sociais adotadas na Espanha. Sem o controle da mídia tradicional, o discurso da extrema direita ganha destaque nas redes sociais, também no caso do Vox. O objetivo desta pesquisa é definir a estratégia política implementada pelo Vox no Twitter durante o confinamento da Covid-19. A análise de frames consiste em três fases com uma análise final dos frames em uma amostra de 6.095 tweets. Os resultados mostram três quadros principais. Anti-elitismo, caracterizado como vitimização e conspiração anti-Vox. Essencialismo definido como ordem moral, nacional e pública. Finalmente, o governo criminoso, o novo quadro de acusação criminal contra o governo. Este estudo sustenta que o Vox combina discursos populistas, liberais e conservadores para negar a legitimidade do governo e se tornar, se tornar uma alternativa ao participar do jogo democrático, apesar de seu discurso ser duvidoso.
Downloads
Article Details
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0.
Referências
Aalberg, T., Strömbäck, J., & de Vreese, C.H. (2012). The framing of politics as strategy and game: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 162-178.
Acemoglu, D., Egorov, G., & Sonin, K.. (2013). A Political Theory of Populism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(2), 771–805. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjs077
Åkerlund, M. (2020). The importance of influential users in (re) producing Swedish far-right discourse on Twitter. European Journal of Communication. 35(6), 613-628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120940909
Alonso-Muñoz, L., & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2018). Communication of European populist leaders on Twitter: Agenda setting and the “more is less” effect. El profesional de la información (EPI), 27(6), 1193-1202. https://doi.org/10.3145/EPI
Álvarez-Junco, J. (2022). Qué hacer con un pasado sucio. Galaxia Gutenberg.
Atton, C. (2006). Far-right media on the internet: culture, discourse and power. New Media and Society, 8(4): 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444806065653
Barrio, A., & Field, B. N. (2018). The push for independence in Catalonia. Nature human behaviour, 2(10), 713-715.
Bliuc, A. M., Faulkner, N., Jakubowicz, A., & McGarty, C. (2018). Online networks of racial hate: A systematic review of 10 years of research on cyber-racism. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.026
Blee, K. M (2007). Ethnographies of the Far Right. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 36(2), 119-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241606298815
Bolsing, R., Palm, K., & Kingsland, J. (2020). The green infrastructure revolution: Creating sustainable places from the ground up. Routledge.
Borah, P. (2011). Conceptual issues in framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade's literature. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 230-256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01539.x
Brubaker, R. (2020). Paradoxes of populism during the pandemic. Thesis Eleven, 164(1),73-87.
Casero-Ripollés, A., Sintes-Olivella, M., & Franch, P. (2017). The Populist Political Communication Style in Action: Podemos’s Issues and Functions on Twitter During the 2016 Spanish General Election. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(9), 986–1001. http://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217707624
Casero-Ripollés, A. (2020). Impact of Covid-19 on the media system. Communicative and democratic consequences of news consumption during the outbreak. El profesional de la información (EPI), 29(2), e290223. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.mar.23
Castelli Gattinara, P. (2017) Framing Exclusion in the Public Sphere: Far- Right Mobilisation and the Debate on Charlie Hebdo in Italy, South European Society and Politics, 22(3), 345-364.
Crosset, V., Tanner, S., & Campana, A. (2019). Researching far right groups on Twitter: Methodological challenges 2.0. New Media and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818817306
David, C. C., Atun, J. M., Fille, E., Monterola, C. (2011). Finding Frames: Comparing Two Methods of Frame Analysis. Communication Methods and Measures, 5(4), 329-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2011.624873
Eberl, J.-M., Huber, R. A., & Greussing, E. (2021). From populism to the “plandemic”: why populists believe in Covid-19 conspiracies. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 31(sup1), 272-284.
Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and social media: how politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information Communication and Society, 20(8), 1109-1126.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4): 58-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
Fairhurst, G., & Sarr, R. (1996). The art of Framing. Jossey-Bass.
Figenschou, T., & Ihlebæk, K. (2018). Challenging Journalistic Authority: Media criticism in far-right alternative media. Journalism Studies, 20, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1500868
Figuereo-Benítez, J. C., Cárdenas Rica, M. L., & Mancinas-Chávez, R. (2022). Transparencia pública para la verificación de datos. El caso de Maldito Dato (Maldita.es). Textual & Visual Media, 1(16), 22-43.
Forti, S., (2021). Extrema derecha 2.0. Qué es y cómo combatirla. Siglo XXI.
Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge University Press.
Gerbaudo, P. (2018). Social media and populism: an elective affinity? Media, Culture & Society, 40(5), 745-753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772192
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Koc Michalska, K., & Römmele, A. (2020). Populism in the era of Twitter: how social media contextualized new insights into an old phenomenon. New Media & Society, 22(4), 585-594
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harper & Row.
Golder, M. (2016). Far Right Parties in Europe. Annual Reviews of Political Science, 19, 477-497.
Guerrero-Solé, F., & Lopez-Gonzalez, H. (2019). Government Formation and Political Discussions in Twitter: An Extended Model for Quantifying Political Distances in Multiparty Democracies. Social Science Computer Review, 37(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317744163
Guerrero-Solé, F., Pujadas, E., Aira, T. & Mas-Manchón, L. (2022). Politicized celebrities against far-right on Twitter. Political preferences and activity of users retweeting Rosalia’s anti Vox tweet after the 2019 general elections in Spain. Mediterranean Journal of Communication, 13(2), https://www.doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM.19953
Guerrero-Solé, F., Mas-Manchón, L., & Aira, T. (2022). El impacto de la ultraderecha en Twitter durante las elecciones españolas de 2019. Cuadernos. info, (51), 223-245.
Iyengar, S. S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. University of Chicago Press.
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1982). On the study of statistical intuitions. Cognition, 11(2), 123-141.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American psychologist, 39(4), 341-350.
Lakoff, G. (1995). Metaphor, Morality, and Politics, or, Why Conservatives Have Left Liberals in the Dust. Social Research, 62(2), 177-213.
Lakoff, G. (1997). Moral Politics: What Conservatives Know That Liberals Don't. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (2004). Don't think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate: the essential guide for progressives. White River Junction, Vt.: Chelsea Green.
Lawrence, R. G. (2000). Game-Framing the Issues: Tracking the Strategy Frame in Public Policy News, Political Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846000198422
Marantz, A. (2019). Antisocial: Online Extremists, Techno-Utopians, and the Hijacking of the American Conversation. Viking.
McSwiney, J. (2020): Social networks and digital organisation: far-right parties at the 2019 Australian federal election. Information, Communication & Society, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1757132
Montané-Goetzemberger, M. M. (2016). La inmunidad española ante partidos de derecha radical. University of Barcelona.
Mudde, C. (2018). The ideology of the extreme right. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137753
Müller, J. (2014). #Podemos. Deconstruyendo a Pablo Iglesias. Deusto-Planeta.
Müller, J. (2019). La sorpresa Vox: Las respuestas a las 10 grandes preguntas que todos nos hacemos sobre Vox. Deusto-Planeta.
Nuñez-Seixas, J. (2018). Suspiros de España. Crítica.
Portelinha, I., & Elcheroth, G. (2016). From marginal to mainstream: The role of perceived social norms in the rise of a far-right movement. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 661-671. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2224
Postman, N. (1985). Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. Penguin.
Protess, D. L., & McCombs, M. (2016). Agenda setting. Routledge.
Reinemann C., Aalberg T., Esser F., Strömbäck J., & de Vreese C. H. (2017). Populist political communication: Towards a model of its causes, forms, and effects. In: T. Aalberg T., F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, & C. de Vreese C. (Eds) Populist Political Communication in Europe, (pp. 12-16). Routledge.
Rone, J. (2021) Far right alternative news media as ‘indignation mobilization mechanisms’: how the far right opposed the Global Compact for Migration. Information, Communication & Society, 25, 1333-1350. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1864001
Rooduijn, M. (2014). The Mesmerising Message: The Diffusion of Populism in Public Debates in Western European Media. Political Studies, 62(4), 726-744. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12074
Rubio-Pueyo, V. (2019). Vox: A New Far Right in Spain. Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung Institute, 1-25.
Ryan, C. (1991). Prime time activism: Media strategies for grassroots organizing. South End Press.
Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a Theory of Media Effects. Journal of Communication, 49(4), 103-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x
Semetko, H. & Valkenburg, P. (2000). Framing European Politics: A Content Analysis of Press and Television News. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x
Stanley, J. (2018). How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them. Random House.
Taggart, P. (2000). Populism: Concepts in the social sciences. Open University Press.
Taggart, P. (2004). Populism and representative politics in contemporary Europe. Journal of political ideologies, 9(3), 269-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356931042000263528
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
Urbinati, N., 2019. Political Theory of Populism. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 111–127.
Veiga, F., González-Villa, C., Forti, S., Sasso, A., Prokopljevic, J., & Moles, R. (2019). Patriotas indignados: Sobre la nueva ultraderecha en la Posguerra Fría. Neofascismo, posfascismo y nazbols. Alianza Editorial.
Valenzuela, S., Piña, M., & Ramírez, J. (2017). Behavioral Effects of Framing on Social Media Users: How Conflict, Economic, Human Interest, and Morality Frames Drive News Sharing. Journal of Communication, 67(5), 803-826. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12325
Waisbord, S. (2018). Truth is what happens to news. Journalism Studies, 19, 1866-1878.